Connect with us

Election

Kamala Harris’s Record on Marijuana: A Tale of Hypocrisy in the Pursuit of Power

Published

on

Kamala Harris smoking a joint in front of a chain gang

As Vice President Kamala Harris steps into the 2024 presidential race as the Democratic nominee, her record as California’s top prosecutor has once again come under intense scrutiny. The very policies she once enforced, sending nearly 2,000 individuals (mostly black men) to state prisons on marijuana-related charges, starkly contrast with her current position advocating for marijuana legalization. This glaring inconsistency has raised questions about the sincerity of her political evolution and the implications it holds for her potential presidency.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

During her tenure as California’s Attorney General from 2011 to 2016, Kamala Harris oversaw the prosecution of 1,974 individuals for marijuana-related offenses, according to a report by the Washington Free Beacon. These prosecutions were part of a broader enforcement strategy that disproportionately affected minority communities, a reality that Harris herself has acknowledged in more recent years. Yet, despite this acknowledgment, the disconnect between her actions as a prosecutor and her rhetoric as a politician cannot be ignored.

Harris has since positioned herself as a champion of criminal justice reform, aligning with President Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign promises to end incarceration for drug use and decriminalize marijuana at the federal level. This pivot, however, raises questions about whether her newfound stance is a genuine change of heart or a calculated move to align with the progressive wing of her party.

A History of Harsh Enforcement

Kamala Harris’s record as Attorney General extends beyond marijuana prosecutions. She also defended controversial cases, such as that of prosecutor Robert Murray, who falsified a confession in a 2015 case. Despite the dismissal of the indictment due to this falsification, Harris’s administration appealed the decision, arguing that only physical brutality could justify such a dismissal. This decision was widely criticized, highlighting a troubling aspect of her prosecutorial approach: a steadfast defense of convictions, even when they were tainted by misconduct.

Moreover, while Harris did mandate body cameras for officers working directly with her office, this policy did not extend to all law enforcement officers across the state. This selective application of accountability measures further underscores the inconsistencies in her approach to criminal justice.

The Hypocrisy of Marijuana Prosecutions

The most glaring contradiction in Kamala Harris’s record lies in her personal history with marijuana. In a 2019 interview, she openly admitted to having smoked marijuana in her youth, even laughing about it. This admission, juxtaposed against her role in incarcerating nearly 2,000 people for similar behavior, has not gone unnoticed.

During the 2019 Democratic primary debates, Harris was confronted by then-Representative Tulsi Gabbard, who accused her of hypocrisy. “She put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana,” Gabbard stated, referencing Harris’s own admission. The exchange was a pivotal moment in the debate, bringing Harris’s prosecutorial record into the spotlight and raising doubts about her commitment to the principles she now espouses.

Harris’s response to the accusation was dismissive, framing the criticism as mere political attacks. “This is the work I’ve done. Am I going to take hits? Of course,” she said. Yet, this response failed to address the core issue: the discrepancy between her past actions and current positions.

The Impact on Minority Communities

The war on drugs, particularly marijuana enforcement, has long been criticized for its disproportionate impact on minority communities. Harris’s record as Attorney General is no exception. The nearly 2,000 marijuana-related incarcerations under her watch were part of a broader pattern of punitive measures that disproportionately targeted African American and Latino communities.

Harris has since acknowledged these disparities, noting that Black Americans are four times more likely than white Americans to be arrested for marijuana possession. However, acknowledging the problem does not erase the impact of her past actions. The individuals who were incarcerated under her watch, many of whom were likely to be young men of color, have had their lives irrevocably altered by the criminal justice system. For these individuals and their families, Harris’s shift in position may seem too little, too late.

A Convenient Evolution?

As Harris positions herself as a progressive leader in the fight for criminal justice reform, it is essential to question the sincerity of this evolution. Her record suggests that her commitment to reform may be more about political expediency than genuine conviction. After all, her shift on marijuana policy only emerged as the political winds changed, particularly as she sought the Democratic nomination in 2020 and now, the presidency in 2024.

Erik Altieri, the Executive Director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), described Harris’s stance on marijuana as “problematic,” arguing that her views on the drug would not qualify as progressive. Indeed, while Harris now champions marijuana legalization, her past actions tell a different story—one of a prosecutor who vigorously enforced laws that disproportionately harmed the very communities she now claims to protect.

The Political Ramifications

As the Democratic nominee for president, Kamala Harris faces a significant challenge in reconciling her past with her present. While she has successfully navigated criticism thus far, her record as California’s Attorney General remains a potent issue that could alienate key voter demographics, particularly young voters and minority communities who are increasingly supportive of marijuana legalization and broader criminal justice reform.

Donald Trump and his campaign will likely seize upon this vulnerability, painting Harris as a hypocrite who cannot be trusted to lead on issues of justice and equality. For voters who are disillusioned with the political establishment, Harris’s perceived inconsistency may reinforce their skepticism about her candidacy.

As Harris campaigns for the highest office in the land, these contradictions will undoubtedly continue to be a focal point of discussion. Whether voters will ultimately see her evolution as a sign of growth or a matter of political convenience remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: Kamala Harris’s past will be a central issue in the 2024 presidential race, and the American people deserve a clear and honest accounting of her record before they cast their votes.

Election

Texans to Vote on 17 Constitutional Amendments, with Historic Homestead Exemption in Spotlight

Published

on

AUSTIN, TX — On November 4, Texas voters will face a marathon ballot featuring 17 proposed amendments to the state’s constitution, a document that has seen over 500 revisions since 1876. Secretary of State Jane Nelson, who oversaw the ballot order draw, urged Texans to seize this chance to “make your voice heard about the governing document of our state.” From tax relief to judicial reform, these propositions reflect a conservative vision of limited government, economic liberty, and state sovereignty. But one measure, Proposition 13, stands out as a landmark effort to deliver substantial property tax relief to homeowners—a cornerstone issue for Texans grappling with rising costs in a state without an income tax.

Proposition 13: A Game-Changer for Homeowners

At the heart of this constitutional lineup is Proposition 13 (SJR 2), which would raise the homestead exemption for school district property taxes from $100,000 to $140,000, with an even higher $150,000 exemption for seniors and disabled homeowners. Paired with a tax rate compression in Senate Bill 1, this measure promises an average savings of $496.57 for homeowners, according to Sen. Paul Bettencourt (R-Houston), the bill’s author. In a unanimous vote, the Texas Senate signaled its commitment to easing the property tax burden, a perennial concern for Texans facing skyrocketing appraisals.

For many, Proposition 13 is a lifeline. Bettencourt noted that 80 to 90% of Texas seniors could pay zero school district property taxes under this plan, as would average homeowners in 49% of Texas school districts where home values fall below $140,000. This is no small feat in a state where property taxes fund much of public education. To address concerns about local revenue losses, Bettencourt emphasized that the state would reimburse school districts, ensuring they remain fully funded. “Today, the Texas Senate delivered a win for homeowners statewide,” he declared, framing the measure as a victory for taxpayers without sacrificing educational quality.

Yet, some lawmakers raised red flags during Senate debates, warning that local taxing entities—cities, counties, and special districts—might offset these savings by raising their own rates. This tension underscores a broader challenge: balancing tax relief with the fiscal needs of local governments. For constitutional conservatives, Proposition 13 embodies the principle that government should prioritize returning money to citizens, but voters must weigh whether the state’s reimbursement plan can prevent local tax hikes that could erode the promised relief.

A Broader Conservative Agenda

While Proposition 13 takes center stage, the remaining 16 amendments advance a robust conservative agenda. Proposition 2 (SJR 18) bans taxes on capital gains—realized or unrealized—protecting wealth creation from state overreach. Proposition 6 (HJR 4) shields securities transactions from occupational or transactional taxes, bolstering financial markets. Proposition 8 (HJR 2) prohibits death taxes on estates or inheritances, ensuring families keep more of their legacy.

Other tax relief measures include Proposition 5 (HJR 99), exempting animal feed held for retail from ad valorem taxes, and Proposition 9 (HJR 1), which extends similar exemptions to income-producing personal property. Proposition 7 (HJR 133) offers tax breaks for surviving spouses of veterans with presumed service-connected conditions, while Proposition 10 (SJR 84) provides temporary exemptions for homestead improvements destroyed by fire. Proposition 11 (SJR 85) further boosts exemptions for elderly and disabled homeowners, complementing Proposition 13’s focus on homestead relief.

Infrastructure and education also feature prominently. Proposition 1 (SJR 59) creates a permanent fund for the Texas State Technical College System, supporting trade programs vital to Texas’ economy. Proposition 4 (HJR 7) dedicates sales tax revenue to the Texas Water Fund, addressing water scarcity in a growing state. Proposition 14 (SJR 3) establishes a $3 billion Dementia Prevention and Research Institute, though its hefty price tag raises questions about fiscal priorities.

Safety, Sovereignty, and Civic Values

Public safety and border security are addressed in Proposition 3 (SJR 5), which mandates bail denial for certain felony offenses, and Proposition 17 (HJR 34), which offers tax exemptions for border security infrastructure in counties along the U.S.-Mexico border. Both align with conservative priorities of law and order and state sovereignty, though the latter’s vague definition of “infrastructure” warrants scrutiny.

Cultural and civic concerns shine through in Proposition 15 (SJR 34), affirming parents as the primary decision-makers for their children—a rebuke to institutional overreach in schools and healthcare. Proposition 16 (SJR 37) clarifies that only U.S. citizens may vote, reinforcing election integrity amid national debates. Proposition 12 (SJR 27) reforms the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, enhancing accountability for judicial misconduct, a move conservatives will welcome as a check on judicial power.

With early voting from October 20-31 and a registration deadline of October 6, Texans must act swiftly to study these amendments. Detailed information is available at VoteTexas.gov. Proposition 13, with its promise of historic tax relief, may dominate headlines, but the full slate demands careful consideration. Each amendment shapes the delicate balance between individual liberty and public needs, a balance constitutional conservatives hold dear.

As Texas voters head to the polls, they carry the weight of self-governance. In a state fiercely proud of its independence, this election is a chance to reaffirm principles of limited government and personal freedom—nowhere more so than in Proposition 13, which could redefine the financial burdens of homeownership for millions. The question is whether Texans will embrace this vision or demand greater clarity on its long-term impacts.

Continue Reading

Election

Abbott’s Backroom Play: How Greg Abbott Used a Legal Loophole to Install Kelly Hancock as Texas Comptroller Without Senate Confirmation

Published

on

In a calculated maneuver that has sent shockwaves through grassroots conservative circles, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has bypassed the standard legislative confirmation process to install outgoing State Senator Kelly Hancock into the role of Texas Comptroller—without the public scrutiny, vetting, or constitutional confirmation typically required by law.

The move, which critics are calling a “legal sleight of hand” and a “raw power grab,” appears designed to give Hancock the advantage of incumbency ahead of the 2026 Republican primary, where he’ll face two formidable, independently-minded opponents: former State Senator Don Huffines and current Railroad Commissioner Christi Craddick.

But beyond its political implications, the scheme raises deeper questions about rule of law, the erosion of constitutional norms in Texas governance, and whether voters are being force-fed another establishment pick wrapped in a bow of bureaucratic trickery.

The Setup: Avoid the Constitution, Install a Loyalist

On June 19, Hancock formally resigned from the Texas Senate and was immediately sworn in—not as Comptroller—but as “chief clerk” of the Comptroller’s office by outgoing Comptroller Glenn Hegar. That title, while bureaucratically bland, comes with sweeping authority over the agency’s operations for the remainder of Hegar’s term, which runs through January 2027.

Hegar, who is leaving to become chancellor of the Texas A&M University System on July 1, heaped praise on Hancock and handed him the reins with the enthusiastic blessing of Abbott.

But here’s the catch: Abbott didn’t appoint Hancock as Comptroller—a move that would have triggered mandatory Senate confirmation under Texas law. Instead, Hancock’s insertion as “chief clerk” is a workaround—a newly invented interim title designed to give him all the power of the office, with none of the accountability.

The workaround skirts a 2002 legal opinion written by none other than then-Attorney General Greg Abbott himself. That opinion declared that a sitting legislator cannot be appointed to a position requiring Senate confirmation during the term for which they were elected. Hancock’s resignation was intended to dodge that prohibition, yet critics say he still falls under constitutional limits due to Texas’ “holdover” clause—a provision that allows legislators to technically retain office until a successor is qualified.

In plain terms: Hancock may not be legally out of the Senate yet, and therefore not legally eligible to hold this new office either.

The Real Goal: An Unelected Incumbency

Why the rush to appoint a placeholder Comptroller for a year and a half? The answer is pure politics: incumbency.

Abbott and his allies understand the power of incumbency in statewide races. Name recognition, official letterhead, media exposure, and the implied authority of office all combine to give Hancock a serious leg up over his grassroots challengers. By installing him now, Abbott ensures that his preferred successor runs not as a candidate—but as the sitting Comptroller.

Hancock wasted no time launching his campaign. Within hours of his swearing-in, he rolled out a slick announcement touting his legislative experience, fiscal conservatism, and support for border security. But that very record is already drawing fire from conservatives, especially his vote to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton and his siding with Democrats to dilute a ban on taxpayer-funded lobbying.

That record hasn’t gone unnoticed by primary voters, either.

Don Huffines: “They Fear You”

Former State Senator Don Huffines didn’t mince words in his response.

“The political elite are manipulating the system to install another go-along-to-get-along lap dog as State Comptroller,” Huffines said. “They don’t just fear me—they fear you, the taxpayers.”

Huffines, who has already earned endorsements from U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, Ron Paul, and a majority of the State Republican Executive Committee, framed the maneuver as part of a broader establishment pattern of undermining grassroots efforts and insulating power among insiders.

“They know that true transparency, the kind I’ve promised, would expose everything,” he said.

Huffines’ campaign is already tapping into the anti-establishment fervor that helped fuel Trump’s rise. He paints Hancock not as a fighter for fiscal integrity, but as a symbol of cronyism and cowardice—a man who lacked the courage to earn the job honestly and instead snuck in through the back door.

Christi Craddick: “I’ve Done the Job”

Current Railroad Commissioner Christi Craddick, a no-nonsense fiscal hawk with actual statewide executive experience, also entered the race undeterred by Hancock’s sudden rise to power.

“I’m the only candidate in this race with statewide experience and a proven record,” she said. “While others play games, I deliver results.”

Craddick has run one of the most revenue-critical agencies in Texas—the Railroad Commission—overseeing billions in oil and gas revenues that fund schools, roads, and law enforcement. She’s pledging to bring that same results-driven approach to the Comptroller’s office.

“I trust the voters to see through political gimmicks. They know what leadership looks like,” she said.

Legal Questions Linger

Beyond the optics and political fallout, constitutional questions still loom. Article XVI, Section 40 of the Texas Constitution prohibits a legislator from being appointed or employed in a civil office during their elected term. The Abbott-Hancock team contends that Hancock’s resignation makes the restriction moot.

But constitutional scholars and conservative legal minds aren’t so sure.

Because Hancock’s replacement hasn’t yet been elected in a special election, he may technically still be “holding over” his Senate seat. That would render his new role unconstitutional—even if it comes with a carefully worded job title designed to muddy the waters.

“This is a clear violation of both the spirit and the letter of the Texas Constitution,” said one former legislative attorney who asked not to be named due to potential backlash. “It’s a loophole engineered for a political ally, and it disrespects the very laws these men swore to uphold.”

Abbott’s Real Message to Texans

Governor Abbott’s rapid endorsement of Hancock—along with his backhanded swipe at Don Huffines as a “candidate who already lost to a Democrat”—reveals much about the governor’s priorities. Abbott appears less interested in an open, transparent race for the state’s chief financial officer and more focused on installing a loyalist who will support his education agenda, including school choice and other spending priorities.

The entire operation has the feel of a political chess game, with Abbott moving pieces behind the curtain to ensure control, compliance, and consolidation of power.

To many observers, the stunt feels less like governance and more like a monarchy: appointments made in private, authority granted by favor, and the people kept safely at arm’s length.

What’s at Stake in March 2026

The 2026 Republican primary for Comptroller is now shaping up to be more than just a contest for a relatively obscure financial office. It’s becoming a litmus test for whether grassroots conservatives still have a say in Texas politics—or whether power brokers like Abbott will continue to manipulate the machinery to protect their allies and sideline principled insurgents.

Texans should pay close attention. If the Comptroller’s office can be quietly handed to a hand-picked insider without constitutional confirmation or public scrutiny, what’s next? Attorney General? Land Commissioner? Lieutenant Governor?

The Hancock appointment is more than a cynical political move. It’s a bellwether. And if Texas conservatives don’t push back hard, they may wake up in a state where elections are merely formalities and public offices are auctioned behind closed doors.

This is about who runs Texas: the people, or the political class.

And in March 2026, the people will have their say—if they’re paying attention.

Continue Reading

Election

Texas House Divided: Rep. Dustin Burrows Defies GOP Caucus, Seeks Democrat Support for Speaker Role

Published

on

Dustin Burrows

GOP Divide Over House Speakership Intensifies

In a dramatic turn of events within the Texas House of Representatives, a showdown over the next Speaker has laid bare deep divisions within the Republican Party. Rep. Dustin Burrows, a close ally of outgoing Speaker Dade Phelan, broke ranks with the GOP caucus after failing to secure the Republican nomination. In an unprecedented move, Burrows aligned himself with Democrats, undermining the party’s choice of Rep. David Cook and igniting outrage among grassroots conservatives.

The Battle for Speaker of the House

On Saturday, the Texas House Republican Caucus met to select its nominee for Speaker, a critical position that sets the legislative agenda and controls committee appointments. The race came down to two contenders: Rep. David Cook, a staunch reformer who had publicly pledged to appoint only Republicans as committee chairs, and Rep. Dustin Burrows, a last-minute entrant who offered no commitments to conservative reforms.

Cook emerged victorious after three rounds of voting, with the final tally standing at 48-14 after 26 members loyal to Burrows walked out. This defection sparked a firestorm, as Burrows and his allies immediately began courting Democratic support in a bid to form a coalition that could challenge Cook on the House floor in January.

A Betrayal of Party Principles

The actions of Burrows and the defectors have drawn sharp condemnation from Republican grassroots activists and party leaders. The Republican Party of Texas (RPT) has long advocated for reforms to ensure Republican control over legislative priorities in a state where Democrats have often wielded disproportionate influence. In 2022, 81% of Republican primary voters supported a resolution requiring that only Republicans serve as committee chairs. Cook’s candidacy embodied this grassroots demand for reform, while Burrows’ maneuvering represents a continuation of the status quo.

The RPT Executive Committee issued a strong resolution following the caucus meeting, calling for unity behind Cook and warning that any member voting against the caucus nominee or supporting a secret ballot for Speaker would face censure. Such a censure could prevent them from running for reelection as Republicans.

The Dustin Burrows Record

Burrows’ record has long been a source of contention among conservatives. As Chairman of the powerful Calendars Committee under Speaker Phelan, Burrows held significant sway over which bills reached the House floor. Critics argue that this power was wielded to suppress conservative priorities.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Burrows championed legislation that expanded the ability of local governments and businesses to enforce mask and vaccine mandates, a move that alienated many Republican voters. He also played a key role in blocking a bill that would have protected minors from irreversible gender-transition procedures, though a similar measure passed in a subsequent session.

More recently, Burrows was one of 61 Republicans who joined Democrats in voting to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton, an act that further fueled skepticism about his conservative credentials. Burrows’ low rankings on conservative scorecards—73rd out of 86 Republicans in the Rice University rankings and a failing 48% grade from Texans for Fiscal Responsibility—underscore his tenuous relationship with the party’s grassroots base.

Grassroots Outrage and Calls to Action

The grassroots backlash to Burrows’ actions has been swift and fierce. Conservative activists argue that Burrows’ alliance with Democrats undermines the integrity of the Republican platform and disregards the will of GOP voters. They have mobilized to pressure representatives to support Cook on the House floor when the legislature convenes on January 14, 2025.

In an email to supporters, Rep. Andy Hopper detailed the events of the caucus meeting and urged constituents to hold their representatives accountable. Hopper emphasized that the caucus rules and the RPT platform explicitly require Republicans to unify behind the caucus nominee, particularly when that nominee is committed to advancing a conservative agenda.

A Pivotal Moment for Texas Republicans

The battle over the Speaker of the House has become a litmus test for the Republican Party’s commitment to conservative principles in Texas. Historically, Democrats have been granted significant influence in the state legislature, including committee chairmanships, despite their minority status. Cook’s victory in the caucus reflects a growing determination among Republicans to end this practice and ensure that legislative leadership reflects the will of the majority.

However, Burrows’ defection threatens to derail these efforts. By seeking Democratic support, he risks fracturing the party and empowering the opposition. The stakes are high: if Burrows and his coalition succeed, it could signal a return to the bipartisan power-sharing arrangements that have long frustrated conservatives.

Conclusion

The January 14 session will be a defining moment for the Texas House of Representatives and the Republican Party. Will Republicans rally behind their caucus nominee and seize the opportunity to implement meaningful reforms, or will divisions within the party allow Democrats to dictate the agenda once again?

As grassroots conservatives mobilize to demand accountability, all eyes will be on the Capitol. For Rep. Burrows and his supporters, the path forward may come with significant political consequences. For the Republican Party, this is a battle for its soul.

Here is the complete list of key representatives in the Texas House Speaker race, categorized by their positions on reform:

(List provided by Grassroots America. https://grassrootspriorities.com/phelan.php)

Daniel Alders
State Representative for Texas House District 6
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @DanielAldersTX
X: @danielalderstx
Trent Ashby
State Representative for Texas House District 9
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0508
Email: trent.ashby@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @RepTrentAshby
X: @TrentAshbyTX
Jeffrey Barry
State Representative for Texas House District 29
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @votejeffbarry
X: @JeffBarryforTX
Cecil Bell
State Representative for Texas House District 3
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0650
Email: Cecil.Bell@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @CecilBellJunior
X: @CBellJr
Keith Bell
State Representative for Texas House District 4
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0458
Email: keith.bell@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @StateRepKeithBell
Greg Bonnen
State Representative for Texas House District 24
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0729
Email: greg.bonnen@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @DrGregBonnen
X: @DrGregBonnen
Brad Buckley
State Representative for Texas House District 54
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0684
Email: brad.buckley@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @bradbuckleyfortexas
X: @BradBuckleyDVM
Ben Bumgarner
State Representative for Texas House District 63
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0688
Email: ben.bumgarner@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @BenBumgarnerforTexasRepHD63
X: @Bumgarner4HD63
Dustin Burrows
State Representative for Texas House District 83
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0542
Email: dustin.burrows@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @Burrows4TX
X: @Burrows4TX
Angie Button
State Representative for Texas House District 112
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0486
Email: angie.button@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @ACBforTexas
X: @AngieChenButton
Briscoe Cain
State Representative for Texas House District 128
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0733
Email: briscoe.cain@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @BriscoeCain
X: @BriscoeCain
Gio Capriglione
State Representative for Texas House District 98
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0690
Email: giovanni.capriglione@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @VoteGiovanni
X: @VoteGiovanni
David Cook
State Representative for Texas House District 96
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0374
Email: david.cook@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @davidcookfortexas
X: @DavidCookTexas
Tom Craddick
State Representative for Texas House District 82
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0500
Email: tom.craddick@house.texas.gov
Charles Cunningham
State Representative for Texas House District 127
Unconfirmed
Phone: 512-463-0520
Email: charles.cunningham@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @CharlesCunninghamTX
X: @CharlesTX127
Pat Curry
State Representative for Texas House District 56
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @people/Pat-Curry-Republican-for-Texas-House/61551098733770/
Drew Darby
State Representative for Texas House District 72
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0331
Email: drew.darby@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @DrewDarbyforTexas
X: @DrewDarbyTX
Jay Dean
State Representative for Texas House District 7
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0750
Email: jay.dean@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @jaydeanfortexas
Mano DeAyala
State Representative for Texas House District 133
Unconfirmed
Phone: 512-463-0514
Email: mano.deayala@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @manoforstaterep
X: @ManoForStateRep
Mark Dorazio
State Representative for Texas House District 122
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0646
Email: mark.dorazio@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @DorazioforTexas
X: @DorazioforTexas
Paul Dyson
State Representative for Texas House District 14
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @PaulDysonTX
X: @PaulDysonTX
Caroline Fairly
State Representative for Texas House District 87
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @fairlyfortexas
X: @FairlyForTexas
James Frank
State Representative for Texas House District 69
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0534
Email: james.frank@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @repjamesfrank
X: @RepJamesFrank
Gary Gates
State Representative for Texas House District 28
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0657
Email: gary.gates@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @gatesfortexas
X: @GatesforTexas
Stan Gerdes
State Representative for Texas House District 17
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0682
Email: stan.gerdes@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @stangerdesfortexashouse
X: @StanGerdesforTX
Charlie Geren
State Representative for Texas House District 99
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0610
Email: charlie.geren@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @repcharliegeren
X: @charliegeren
Ryan Guillen
State Representative for Texas House District 31
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0416
Email: ryan.guillen@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @representative.guillen
X: @RyanGuillen
Sam Harless
State Representative for Texas House District 126
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0496
Email: sam.harless@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @samharless126
X: @SamHarless126
Cody Harris
State Representative for Texas House District 8
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0730
Email: cody.harris@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @CodyforTexas
X: @CodyforTexas
Caroline Harris Davila
State Representative for Texas House District 52
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0670
Email: caroline.harris@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @CarolineHarrisForTexas
X: @CarolineForTX
Brian Harrison
State Representative for Texas House District 10
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0516
Email: brian.harrison@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @votebrianharrison
X: @brianeharrison
Richard Hayes
State Representative for Texas House District 57
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0556
Email: richard.hayes@house.texas.gov
Cole Hefner
State Representative for Texas House District 5
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0271
Email: cole.hefner@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @votecolehefner
X: @ColeHefnerTX
Hillary Hickland
State Representative for Texas House District 55
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @Hickland4TX
X: @HicklandHillary
Janis Holt
State Representative for Texas House District 18
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @Holt4Texas
X: @JanisHolt59
Andy Hopper
State Representative for Texas House District 64
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @hopperfortexas
X: @AndyHopperTX
Lacey Hull
State Representative for Texas House District 138
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0727
Email: lacey.hull@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @LaceyHullForTexas
X: @LaceyHullTX
Todd Hunter
State Representative for Texas House District 32
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0672
Email: todd.hunter@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @todd.hunter.710
X: @Dist32StateRep
Carrie Isaac
State Representative for Texas House District 73
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0325
Email: carrie.isaac@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @CarrieIsaacForTexas
X: @CarrieIsaac
Helen Kerwin
State Representative for Texas House District 58
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @helenkerwin4tx
X: @HelenKerwin4TX
Ken King
State Representative for Texas House District 88
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0736
Email: ken.king@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @KingForTexas
X: @KingForTexas
Stan Kitzman
State Representative for Texas House District 85
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0604
Email: stan.kitzman@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @StanKitzmanTX
X: @StanKitzmanTX
Marc LaHood
State Representative for Texas House District 121
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @MarcLaHoodCampaign
X: @LaHood4Texas
Stan Lambert
State Representative for Texas House District 71
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0718
Email: stan.lambert@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @RepStanLambert
X: @RepStanLambert
Brooks Landgraf
State Representative for Texas House District 81
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0546
Email: brooks.landgraf@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @BrooksLandgraf
X: @BrooksLandgraf
Jeff Leach
State Representative for Texas House District 67
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0544
Email: jeff.leach@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @leachfortexas
X: @leachfortexas
Mitch Little
State Representative for Texas House District 65
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @people/Mitch-Little-State-Rep-ELECT-HD-65/61552635488586/
X: @realmitchlittle
Janie Lopez
State Representative for Texas House District 37
Unconfirmed
Phone: 512-463-0640
Email: janie.lopez@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @JanieLopezForTexas
X: @JanieLopezForTX
AJ Louderback
State Representative for Texas House District 30
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @aj.louderback.1
X: @LouderbackAj
David Lowe
State Representative for Texas House District 91
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @DavidLowe4TX
X: @DavidLowe4Texas
J. M. Lozano
State Representative for Texas House District 43
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0463
Email: jm.lozano@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @RepJMLozano
X: @RepJMLozano
John Lujan
State Representative for Texas House District 118
Unconfirmed
Phone: 512-463-0714
Email: john.lujan@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @VoteLujan
X: @LujanForTX
Shelley Luther
State Representative for Texas House District 62
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @shelleylutherHD62
X: @ShelleyLuther
Don McLaughlin
State Representative for Texas House District 80
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @donfortexas
X: @donfortexas
John McQueeney
State Representative for Texas House District 97
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Facebook: @McQueeneyForTX
X: @JohnMcQueeneyTX
Will Metcalf
State Representative for Texas House District 16
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0726
Email: will.metcalf@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @WillMetcalfTX
X: @willmetcalfTX
Morgan Meyer
State Representative for Texas House District 108
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0367
Email: morgan.meyer@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @MorganMeyerForTexas
X: @MorganMeyerTX
Brent Money
State Representative for Texas House District 2
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @brentmoneytx
X: @BrentMoneyTX
Matt Morgan
State Representative for Texas House District 26
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @morganfortexas
X: @morgan4texas
Candy Noble
State Representative for Texas House District 89
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0186
Email: candy.noble@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @CandyNobleHD89
X: @CandyNobleHD89
Michael Olcott
State Representative for Texas House District 60
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @votemikeolcott
X: @olcott4texas
Tom Oliverson
State Representative for Texas House District 130
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0661
Email: tom.oliverson@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @TomOliverson
X: @TomOliverson
Angelia Orr
State Representative for Texas House District 13
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0600
Email: angelia.orr@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @AngeliaOrrForTX
X: @AngeliaOrrForTX
Jared Patterson
State Representative for Texas House District 106
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0694
Email: jared.patterson@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @jpattersontx
X: @JaredLPatterson
Dennis Paul
State Representative for Texas House District 129
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0734
Email: dennis.paul@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @Dennis.Paul.HD129
X: @DennisPaul129
Dade Phelan
State Representative for Texas House District 21
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-1000
Email: dade.phelan@speaker.texas.gov
Facebook: @TexansForDade
X: @DadePhelan
Katrina Pierson
State Representative for Texas House District 33
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @KatrinaForTexas
X: @katrinapierson
Keresa Richardson
State Representative for Texas House District 61
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @keresafortexas
X: @KeresaForTexas
Nate Schatzline
State Representative for Texas House District 93
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0562
Email: nate.schatzline@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @NateforTexas
X: @NateSchatzline
Mike Schofield
State Representative for Texas House District 132
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0528
Email: mike.schofield@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @SchofieldForTexas
X: @RepSchofield
Alan Schoolcraft
State Representative for Texas House District 44
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @SchoolcraftforTX
X: @Schoolcraft4TX
Matt Shaheen
State Representative for Texas House District 66
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0594
Email: matt.shaheen@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @MattShaheenTexas
X: @MattShaheen
Joanne Shofner
State Representative for Texas House District 11
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @joannefortexans
X: @joannefortexans
Shelby Slawson
State Representative for Texas House District 59
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0628
Email: shelby.slawson@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @SlawsonForTexas
X: @ShelbySlawson
John Smithee
State Representative for Texas House District 86
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0702
Email: john.smithee@house.texas.gov
David Spiller
State Representative for Texas House District 68
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0526
Email: david.spiller@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @RepresentativeDavidSpiller
X: @DavidSpillerTX
Valoree Swanson
State Representative for Texas House District 150
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0572
Email: valoree.swanson@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @ValoreeSwansonforTexas
X: @ValoreeforTexas
Carl Tepper
State Representative for Texas House District 84
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0676
Email: carl.tepper@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @CarlTepperForTexas
X: @CarlTepper
Tony Tinderholt
State Representative for Texas House District 94
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0624
Email: tony.tinderholt@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @tonytinderholtfortexas
X: @reptinderholt
Steve Toth
State Representative for Texas House District 15
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0797
Email: steve.toth@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @RepresentativeSteveToth
X: @Toth_4_Texas
Ellen Troxclair
State Representative for Texas House District 19
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0490
Email: ellen.troxclair@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @EllenTroxclair
X: @EllenTroxclair
Gary VanDeaver
State Representative for Texas House District 1
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0692
Email: gary.vandeaver@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @GaryVanDeaverHD1
X: @GaryVanDeaver
Cody Vasut
State Representative for Texas House District 25
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0564
Email: cody.vasut@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @votevasut
X: @cvasut
Denise Villalobos
State Representative for Texas House District 34
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Facebook: @denise.etheridge.58
X: @DVillalobos20
Wesley Virdell
State Representative for Texas House District 53
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @wesvirdellfortexas
X: @wesvirdelltx
Trey Wharton
State Representative for Texas House District 12
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Facebook: @profile.php?id=61553738502474
X: @WhartonForTexas
Terry Wilson
State Representative for Texas House District 20
Anti-Reform – Siding wih Democrats and Burrows
Phone: 512-463-0309
Email: terry.wilson@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @TerryWilsonPage
X: @TerryWilsonTX
Terri Leo Wilson
State Representative for Texas House District 23
Pro-Reform – Committed to Republican Cook for Speaker
Phone: 512-463-0502
Email: terri.leo-wilson@house.texas.gov
Facebook: @TerriLeoWilson
X: @TerriLeoWilson
Continue Reading

Trending